Posts

I noticed the description for “nudity” says something like “don’t use for bottomless characters”, but I find it on pictures where characters wear shirts and the like. Is this still being discussed?

Premises

• Nudity is defined here as “exposure of sexual bodyparts” (breasts, genitals, anus, butt…)
• Nudity tags are relative to the normal presence of clothes and genitals in official depictions of this character.
• Nudity tags include, for example: casual nudity, nudity, full frontal nudity, tasteful nudity, forced nudity, exposure, clothed/nude etc. and generally anything that is implied to the tag “nudity” (except for the rating tag “nude only”)
  • However, nudity tags do NOT include things like “bottomless”, “topless” and “X only” as they do not necessarily expose genitals.
• All tags that are variants of “fully nude” and “partially nude” are aliased to “nudity”, with the exception of “full frontal nudity”, which has a specific meaning
• This chart assumes no tag for a character like Bugs Bunny who is normally without clothes and a featureless crotch

Flowchart

1. No genitals shown:
   • The character is depicted with a featureless crotch
     • There are boobs depicted → apply a nudity tag only if nipples are present.
       • If no nipples/areolas → Use featureless X tag(s) as appropriate.
     • Is this character depicted with less clothing than normal for this character?
       1. Yes → Use an appropriate combination of nudity and rating tag
       2. No → Use featureless X tag(s) as appropriate.
   • The genitals are implied, but not visible, and the character is completely or mostly nude
     • Is the image suggestive/seductive?
       1. Yes → Use “pinup” and “tasteful nudity”
       2. No → Use “tasteful nudity” or “casual nudity” alone
2. The character is a feral
   • Is this character normally depicted/implied as wearing clothes? (e.g. Paw Patrol, Commission series of [url=https://inkbunny.net/gallery/TheSuperProfessor]TheSuperProfessor[/url]…)
     1. No → Do not use any nudity tag, apply featureless crotch if appropriate
        • Do not use “featureless chest” unless this feral character is normally depicted with nipples or breasts.
     2. Yes → Use the tag “clothed feral”
        • Are genitals depicted?
          1. No → apply appropriate non-explicit tags such as “featureless crotch”, “tasteful nudity” or “exposure” as appropriate
          2. Yes → Apply nudity tags as you would for an anthro character
             • Do not use “featureless chest” unless this feral character is normally depicted with nipples or breasts.

Anthro nudity:

• Apply “nudity” only if breasts, butt or genitals are visible (including if covered by transparent, or fishnet clothing). Otherwise just the clothing-related tags such as “X only”, “bottomless” or “topless”
  • A character flashing or exposing their underwear is not nudity. Apply “underwear exposure” (this tag is not implied to nudity).
• Tags on top of “nudity”
  • Apply “full frontal nudity” if the entire area from the crotch to the neck is functionally exposed and visible to the viewer (i.e. ignoring belts, straps, and bondage gear)
    • Except for censoring, the genitals must be fully visible and unobscured
  • Apply “ineffective clothing” only if genitals are present and not covered by the clothing, otherwise, just use use “X only” or “transparent/fishnet clothing” if appropriate. (“unconvincing armor” can be used regardless of genital visibility)

Definition of “clothing”

• Leather straps
• Wraps other than chest wraps or full-body wraps (currently not used)
• Bandages
• Glasses, goggles and other eyewear
• Jewelry and similar accessories, such as wristbands, lanyards etc.
• Collars
• Cock rings

• certain fetish gears such as chastity cages or harnesses are not implied to clothing tags, but they can still be used as “X only”
• Belts are clothing, but “belt only” is not a tag because no one wears a belt alone for coverage

1. The easy option: roll back the implication.
2. The hard option: make it so that Safe and Grotesque don’t conflict, or the staff will have to add “Safe” to innocuous diaper pictures forever. I’ve never seen a Philomena Booru where Safe would be paired up with any other rating, every Philomena Booru tells you CAN’T combine Safe with those. Is it even possible to change this presumably hard-coded thing?
3. Another easy option: for ALL pictures with diapers, always use “Grotesque” and never use “Safe”

@Dillocircus
Thank you! Some of these I thought meant the same things judging by images they were applied to, and I still don’t know what’s the difference between “full body” and “full-length portrait”, sorry. Why does “convenient censoring” imply “convenient censorship” though?

So “kid” has this explanation: A human shota or loli. For cubs, don’t use this tag. Okay.

@Stinkek

The entire set of tags related to age/child/cub is a bit of a hot mess and I do want to ask Pup (the admin/owner) to draw some clear guideliens decisions for why in the upload tag list the tag indicated is “child”, a tage that is aliased to young (?!) while the wiki seems to be using “kid” instead, and the distinction between that and “cub” are poor at best. Also “cub” is sued for the generic tags like adult/cub, adding to the confusion.

However, Pup is incommunicado for almost three weeks now.

@Dillocircus
Ouch… I had some Booru-related heartbreak myself. I put too much passion into a free Booru platform that would be shut down in a month or a few.

So “kid” has this explanation: A human shota or loli. For cubs, don’t use this tag. Okay.