Viewing last 25 versions of post by Stinkek in topic UNofficial implication thread

I just realised the *diaper implies grotesque* thing has created a HUGE problem for regular users as they can't edit tags for a picture anymore if it has "safe" and "grotesque". I just wanted to add "full-length portrait" to that baby worm in a clean diaper without touching those tags - nope!

I can think of 3 ideas on how to solve this problem:
1) The easy option: roll back the implication.
2) The hard option: make it so that Safe and Grotesque don't conflict, or the staff will have to add "Safe" to innocuous diaper pictures forever. I've never seen a Philomena Booru where Safe would be paired up with any other rating, every Philomena Booru tells you CAN'T combine Safe with those. Is it even possible to change this presumably hard-coded thing?
3) Another easy option: for ALL pictures with diapers, always use "Grotesque" and never use "Safe"

With the way things are now, we'd have to report pictures with these two tags so the staff could do the tag editing for us, that we could've done ourselves in any other situation. More important reports could end up buried under these!

For now, I'll stop sharing pictures with diapers.

I just realised the *diaper implies grotesque* thing has created a HUGE problem for regular users as they can't edit tags for a picture anymore if it has "safe" and "grotesque". I just wanted to add "full-length portrait" to that baby worm in a clean diaper without touching those tags - nope!

I can think of 3 ideas on how to solve this problem:
1) The easy option: roll back the implication.
2) The hard option: make it so that Safe and Grotesque don't conflict, or the staff will have to add "Safe" to innocuous pictures forever. I've never seen a Philomena Booru where Safe would be paired up with any other rating, every Philomena Booru tells you CAN'T combine Safe with those. Is it even possible to change this presumably hard-coded thing?
3) Another easy option: for ALL pictures with diapers, always use "Grotesque" and never use "Safe"

With the way things are now, we'd have to report pictures with these two tags so the staff could do the tag editing for us, that we could've done ourselves in any other situation. More important reports could end up buried under these!

For now, I'll stop sharing pictures with diapers.

I just realised the *diaper implies grotesque* thing has created a HUGE problem for regular users as they can't edit tags for a picture anymore if it has "safe" and "grotesque". I just wanted to add "full-length portrait" to that baby worm in a clean diaper without touching those tags - nope!

I can think of 3 ideas on how to solve this problem:
1) The easy option: roll back the implication.
2) The hard option: make it so that Safe and Grotesque don't conflict, or the staff will have to add "Safe" to innocuous pictures forever. I've never seen a Philomena Booru where Safe would be paired up with any other rating, every Philomena Booru tells you CAN'T combine Safe with those. Is it even possible to change this presumably hard-coded thing?
3) Another easy option: stop using "Safe" for ALL pictures with diapers., always use "Grotesque" and never use "Safe"

With the way things are now, we'd have to report pictures with these two tags so the staff could do the tag editing for us, that we could've done ourselves in any other situation. More important reports could end up buried under these!

I just realised the *diaper implies grotesque* thing has created a HUGE problem for regular users as they can't edit tags for a picture anymore if it has "safe" and "grotesque". I just wanted to add "full-length portrait" to that baby worm in a clean diaper without touching those tags - nope!

I can think of 23 ideas on how to solve this problem:
1) The easy option: roll back the implication.
2) The hard option: make it so that Safe and Grotesque don't conflict, or the staff will have to add "Safe" to innocuous pictures forever. I've never seen a Philomena Booru where Safe would be paired up with any other rating, every Philomena Booru tells you CAN'T combine Safe with those. Is it even possible to change this presumably hard-coded thing?
3) Another easy option: stop using "Safe" for ALL pictures with diapers.

With the way things are now, we'd have to report pictures with these two tags so the staff could do the tag editing for us, that we could've done ourselves in any other situation. More important reports could end up buried under these!

I just realised the *diaper implies grotesque* thing has created a HUGE problem for regular users as they can't edit tags for a picture anymore if it has "safe" and "grotesque". I just wanted to add "full-length portrait" to that baby worm in a clean diaper without touching those tags - nope!

I can think of 2 ideas on how to solve this problem:
1) The easy option: roll back the implication.
2) The hard option: make it so that Safe and Grotesque don't conflict, or the staff will have to add "Safe" to innocuous pictures forever. I've never seen a Philomena Booru where Safe would be paired up with any other rating, every Philomena Booru tells you CAN'T combine Safe with those. Is thist even possible to change this presumably hard-coded thing?

With the way things are now, we'd have to report pictures with these two tags so the staff could do the tag editing for us, that we could've done ourselves in any other situation. More important reports could end up buried under these!