Dillocircus 
Moderator
cub appreciator
just to be clear: no mod means no one is able to switch tags into species/copyright/character ones, or create aliases and implications.
I literally have no idea what actions (if any!) assistants can even do
Posts
Search Results
Site and Policy » [resolved] I have been demoted. I do not know if there is any active mod » Topic Opener
Dillocircus
I do not know why or whether Pup or Galener is responsible. This is quite annoying as I was doing some cleanup of tags just this morning.
I have no idea if there is any mod active whatsoever now.
Moderator
cub appreciator
EDIT: the situation has been fully resolved (thank you Galener) and I will be able to resolve my work.
Site and Policy » Complex filters break the site » Post 3
Dillocircus
Moderator
cub appreciator
I genuinely have NO idea. I’m just as much out of the loop as you are. Being on here feels like twilight zone sometimes…
Site and Policy » Complex filters break the site » Post 2
Stinkek
poser
@Dillocircus
OMG, it’s back, do you know what happened? Pup still doesn’t seem to be around and hasn’t responded to me on IB. I joined the site’s Telegram group chat and when I brought up the fact the site was down, I was ghosted, everyone kept acting like nothing happened! Crazy stuff… I probably worry too much, but I had a thought that maybe I wrote something that got attention from the wrong people and they attacked the site in some way…
Either way, I don’t want to try complex filters again until this site gets updates again.
OMG, it’s back, do you know what happened? Pup still doesn’t seem to be around and hasn’t responded to me on IB. I joined the site’s Telegram group chat and when I brought up the fact the site was down, I was ghosted, everyone kept acting like nothing happened! Crazy stuff… I probably worry too much, but I had a thought that maybe I wrote something that got attention from the wrong people and they attacked the site in some way…
Either way, I don’t want to try complex filters again until this site gets updates again.
Site and Policy » Complex filters break the site » Post 1
Dillocircus
Moderator
cub appreciator
@Stinkek
… I genuinely can’t tell whether you’re suggesting this is why the entire website was offline for like a week.
… I genuinely can’t tell whether you’re suggesting this is why the entire website was offline for like a week.
Site and Policy » Complex filters break the site » Topic Opener
Stinkek
poser
E.g. if I put
(big breasts, NOT young) to a complex filter field, save the filter and try to open ANY page with images, I get the following error message:404 Not Found
openresty/1.25.3.1
openresty/1.25.3.1
This doesn’t happen when the complex filter lists are empty.
Site and Policy » UNofficial implication thread » Post 29
Dillocircus
Moderator
cub appreciator
@Stinkek
yeah, I may have to reverse that. I know that it was not originally like that though, because there was not enough uses of it to reflect the amount of actual images with OCs in them.
yeah, I may have to reverse that. I know that it was not originally like that though, because there was not enough uses of it to reflect the amount of actual images with OCs in them.
Either way, I can mass-remove the tag easily, so don’t worry about it too much. I’ll be the one taking any flak (and mass-readding it lol) if Pup’s upset over it 😅
Turns out Philomena’s namespace thing results in this EXTREMELY awkward thing where “oc:” is not actually part of the tag name, so while you can search for all oc: tags, you cannot use a search like “oc:” to find all images with oc tags, because that search is considered exactly the same as “”…
Site and Policy » UNofficial implication thread » Post 28
Stinkek
poser
Seeing how oc has been made an error tag recently, I noticed it appears automatically when you tag an OC, but it’s (apparently) not actually implied by anything, which is weird, and you always to have to remove it manually.
Site and Policy » UNofficial implication thread » Post 27
Dillocircus
Moderator
cub appreciator
@Dillocircus
human-like feet on species that aren’t human or humanoid, especially when like half of the canvas is occupied by feet.
In theory the latter is filtered off with “foot focus” (though I have no idea how prevalent that tag is on cutepa.ws for images that you want to aviod).
Site and Policy » UNofficial implication thread » Post 26
Stinkek
poser
@Dillocircus
Fair enough…
I wondered about “non-mammalian nipples” as well. I think most people don’t give a shit about non-mammals having nipples.
The fingers thing makes me think, I hope the finger count and toe count tags stay, because… I don’t how common this is, but I have a pet peeve with human-like feet on species that aren’t human or humanoid, especially when like half of the canvas is occupied by feet.
Fair enough…
I wondered about “non-mammalian nipples” as well. I think most people don’t give a shit about non-mammals having nipples.
The fingers thing makes me think, I hope the finger count and toe count tags stay, because… I don’t how common this is, but I have a pet peeve with human-like feet on species that aren’t human or humanoid, especially when like half of the canvas is occupied by feet.
Site and Policy » General thoughts on Cutepa.ws » Post 12
Stinkek
poser
I’ve reversed on soiled diapers (though I’ll ask Pup to properly rule on that)
You reversed on diapers in general. Used diapers definitely fall under Grotesque for obvious reasons.
I just hope there won’t be any more staff-made rating tag conflicts that would cripple regular users.
I just hope there won’t be any more staff-made rating tag conflicts that would cripple regular users.
Site and Policy » UNofficial implication thread » Post 25
Dillocircus
Moderator
cub appreciator
foreskin tug -> foreskin
humanoid penis -> humanoid genitalia
spread anus -> anus
spread vulva -> vulva
done
I noticed cocklet is defined as a small humanoid penis, however I’ve seen some penises under this tag that don’t look humanoid but more like a tapering penis, with no glans.
It had “small penis” aliased to it before I came in. So no, it’s just all small penii regardless of anatomical type.
raised tail, tail grab -> tail
If someone does it, it won’t be me. Hell, I’d rather remove all implications and make the tag invalid! IMO “tail” (or any other basic anatomical tags like “legs”, “eyes” or “fingers”) is used in a completely pointless way on e621, and by extension other boorus. There’s no reason to tag for features that are gonna be in the vast majority of images that happen to show the relevant section of the body. There’s a reason we don’t tag stuff as “character present” or “drawn art”: it’s part of the very medium!
Now tagging for the unexpected absence or presence of a feature is far more useful with tags like , though even there I think e61 goes WAY overboard with stuff like “non-mammalian nipples”.
Site and Policy » General thoughts on Cutepa.ws » Post 11
Dillocircus
Moderator
cub appreciator
I can’t distinguish between Nude Only and Explicit when there are naked characters with no sexual activity.
I agree the guidelines could stand to be more specific (and it is a major point I intend to bring up to pup if and when he reappears). My approach is for the most part, tag with “nude only” for casual nudity and stuff like accidental/innocent exposures or peeks etc. If there’s anything else besides the nudity/erection that would otherwise prevent a safe rating (e.g. precum, ogling, blatant bedroom eyes, a direct offer/invitation for sex, discarded sex toys, off-screen sex happening etc.), tag with explicit.
Grotesque turns out to be broader than it’s defined.
Admittedly I’ve thrown a few things in there that I maybe shouldn’t have:
- I’ve reversed on soiled diapers (though I’ll ask Pup to properly rule on that)
- I have added cock vore, but it turns out there was some of it before (I thought there wasn’t, yes I’m a dumbass) and it wasn’t tagged, so I’ll reverse on that too, even though I think it should be in there.
Ultimately, IMO, it’d be less work to have an overarching “body waste” tag that anyone can filter off easily rather than use this awkward and vague term
Grimdark is left open to interpretation.
Hell, it’s awfully vague everywhere else as far as I can tell. Again, I’d rather have a tag called “gore and body horror” rather than this stuff, which for all I know would encompass suicidal thoughts or fascist imagery! Note that candy gore is pretty clearly not grimdark, but should probably be encompassed by something.
Site and Policy » UNofficial implication thread » Post 24
Stinkek
poser
foreskin tug -> foreskin
humanoid penis -> humanoid genitalia
raised tail, tail grab -> tail
spread anus -> anus
spread vulva -> vulva
humanoid penis -> humanoid genitalia
raised tail, tail grab -> tail
spread anus -> anus
spread vulva -> vulva
I noticed cocklet is defined as a small humanoid penis, however I’ve seen some penises under this tag that don’t look humanoid but more like a tapering penis, with no glans.
Site and Policy » General thoughts on Cutepa.ws » Post 10
Stinkek
poser
The Tag Guidelines REALLY need to be revised. For the most part they’re just copied from Furbooru, but things here don’t work the same way. I can’t distinguish between Nude Only and Explicit when there are naked characters with no sexual activity. Grotesque turns out to be broader than it’s defined. Grimdark is left open to interpretation.
Site and Policy » Mega Alias thread » Post 24
Stinkek
poser
evolutionary family indicates there are at least 2 Pokemon in the said evolutionary family depicted, so why does litten imply it?
Site and Policy » Mega Alias thread » Post 23
Dillocircus
Moderator
cub appreciator
@Stinkek
I’m not entirely sure, but I did notice that’s what e621’s conditional_DNP tag aliases to.
I’m not entirely sure, but I did notice that’s what e621’s conditional_DNP tag aliases to.
Site and Policy » General thoughts on Cutepa.ws » Post 9
Dillocircus
Moderator
cub appreciator
I noticed my director tag is now listed in my profile even though I never requested its verification, which surprised me, but OK.
I also noticed that if one browses the Recent Artwork section in my profile, it returns results for both the artist and the director tags. I knew about the || / OR thing, but I never thought this was technically possible.
That’s me taking the initiative when I noticed you were also generating stuff.
Site and Policy » General thoughts on Cutepa.ws » Post 8
Stinkek
poser
I noticed my director tag is now listed in my profile even though I never requested its verification, which surprised me, but OK.
I also noticed that if one browses the Recent Artwork section in my profile, it returns results for both the artist and the director tags. I knew about the || / OR thing, but I never thought this was technically possible.
I also noticed that if one browses the Recent Artwork section in my profile, it returns results for both the artist and the director tags. I knew about the || / OR thing, but I never thought this was technically possible.
Site and Policy » Mega Alias thread » Post 22
Stinkek
poser
What purpose does the tag e621 dnp serve? I know E621 has a DNP list of its own, but in the context of posting to Cutepa.ws it’s irrelevant.
Site and Policy » Team17 worms and gender/sex tags » Topic Opener
Stinkek
poser
This is oddly specific, so I won’t be surprised if this gets ignored for a long time. But I’ve been thinking about it for a while.
In the Worms series, the concept of gender is mostly to completely irrelevant. When you create a team of worms, you can name them anything you want, and mix and match voices and visual customisation items however you please. Depending on the game you may have access to soundbanks that sound gender-neutral/feminine/masculine, “feminine” items (particularly hair styled in ways typically associated with women) and “masculine” items (particularly facial hair). Depending on the selected voice worms may use gendered terms to refer to other worms. However there’s no option to select gender, and worms don’t really have sexual dimorphism. In Worms Rumble you play as a single nameless worm, but customisation is the same.
There are canon characters with established genders, but they’re typically not fleshed out and ignored by the fanbase anyway. IMO the only character to stand out is Professor Worminkle from Worms 4 Mayhem.
There are canon characters with established genders, but they’re typically not fleshed out and ignored by the fanbase anyway. IMO the only character to stand out is Professor Worminkle from Worms 4 Mayhem.
When I post my own Worms art here and on DA/FA/IB/Aethy, I typically label the worms as male, unless they look stereotypically feminine or have visible female body parts.
On E621 I only repost other’s art (with the exception of 1 drawing, for now..?) and I tag it as “ambiguous_gender” unless there’s sexual dimorphism present, which is due to the rules over there. When I recently joined Furbooru, I decided to carry over E621’s tagging criteria.
Sometimes I wonder if I should change my tagging approach here to what I do on E621/Furbooru.
On E621 I only repost other’s art (with the exception of 1 drawing, for now..?) and I tag it as “ambiguous_gender” unless there’s sexual dimorphism present, which is due to the rules over there. When I recently joined Furbooru, I decided to carry over E621’s tagging criteria.
Sometimes I wonder if I should change my tagging approach here to what I do on E621/Furbooru.
Also I have a Neocities site were I post worms I drew and generated, I considered linking to it as a source, but with the way it’s structured the best thing I could do would be using direct image links, which is frowned upon..?
Speaking of scores, downvotes are disabled on Manebooru, another Philomena-based Booru. I just thought it was interesting.
Speaking of scores, downvotes are disabled on Manebooru, another Philomena-based Booru. I just thought it was interesting.
This may sound cringe, but I proposed the idea of a Worms Booru to someone, and I actually felt excited talking about it, until they said I’d be the one paying for it. So that’s not happening.
Showing results 26 - 50 of 227 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |